Trump Said He'd 'Remember' Companies That Didn't Apply for Tariff Refunds. They're Applying Anyway
It was one of those moments that makes Washington hold its breath, the kind of off-the-cuff presidential remark that K Street lobbyists spend weeks trying to decode.
President Donald Trump was on CNBC's Squawk Box, fielding a question about whether companies like Apple and Amazon were holding off on asking for their tariff money back, out of fear of offending him. He leaned in.
"It's brilliant if they don't do that," Trump said. "Actually, if they don't do that, they've got to know me very well. I'm very honored by what you just said."
Then came the line that landed like a thunderclap across every corporate boardroom with an import portfolio: "If they don't do that, I'll remember them."
The threat was unmistakable. The implication was clear: stay loyal to me, and there will be benefits. Come after your money, and I won't forget it.
But here's the thing about corporate boardrooms: they also have to answer to shareholders, to balance sheets, and to something called fiduciary duty. And those forces? They don't care much about presidential loyalty tests.
The result? A quiet stampede. Thousands of companies, including many of the biggest names in American business, are applying for their refunds anyway. Some publicly. Some very, very quietly. All of them betting that $166 billion is worth more than staying in anyone's good graces.
The Phone Call That Shook K Street
Let's rewind to the moment this all began.
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Trump had exceeded his authority when he used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law designed for genuine national emergencies, to impose sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs on imports from nearly every country.
The ruling was a body blow to the administration's trade agenda. But it created an even bigger mess: the U.S. government had already collected roughly $166 billion in tariffs from more than 330,000 importers across 53 million individual shipments. And now, a federal judge was ordering that money returned.
The administration scrambled. Customs and Border Protection rushed to build something called the CAPE portal (Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries), essentially a digital claims window for importers to ask for their money back.
And then, on April 21, 2026, Trump made that phone call to CNBC.
When anchor Andrew Ross Sorkin mentioned that Apple was among the companies holding off on applying, apparently worried about upsetting the president, Trump's response was equal parts flattery and warning. "I'll remember them" was a phrase dripping with subtext, the kind of language that made veterans of Trump's first term immediately think of the companies that found themselves in his Twitter crosshairs.
Side note: This isn't hypothetical. Ask Walmart. In spring 2025, after the retailer said it might raise prices due to tariffs, Trump publicly told them to "eat the tariffs." Ask Amazon, whose low-cost Haul division was accused by the administration of committing a "hostile and political act" over pricing practices. The playbook was already written.
So when Trump said he'd "remember," corporate America took it seriously. Very seriously.
At first, it worked. Some of the biggest names, Apple, Amazon, Target, Walmart , appeared to hold back, not filing requests in the early days after the portal opened. The strategy seemed to be: wait, watch, and don't be first.
But then, something shifted.
A $166 Billion Question Mark
Here's the number that changed the calculus: $166 billion. That's how much the U.S. government collected and now owes, potentially the largest repayment in American history.
To put that in perspective: $166 billion is roughly the GDP of Ukraine. It's more than the market capitalization of companies like Boeing or Starbucks. It's not "accounting error" money. It's "this changes our annual results" money.
And for individual companies, the sums are staggering:
- Walmart is projected to receive approximately $10.2 billion
- Target could get around $2.2 billion
- Nike is looking at $1 billion
- Home Depot , about $540 million
- Kohl's and Gap , $550 million and $400 million, respectively
Think about that for a second. Walmart's projected refund alone is larger than the annual revenue of many Fortune 500 companies. These aren't rounding errors. These are material sums that affect earnings, stock prices, capital allocation decisions, and, critically, shareholder returns.
And shareholders? They tend to ask uncomfortable questions when management leaves billions on the table over political concerns.
Which brings us to the quiet stampede.
The Quiet Stampede: Who's Applying Anyway
One month after Trump's warning, the landscape has completely transformed.
Walmart confirmed it's seeking what it's owed. So has Apple. Target has filed. Nike is in. Home Depot, General Motors, John Deere, FedEx, and Costco , all of them are pursuing refunds.
Even companies that initially held back have reversed course. According to Politico, more than 26,000 companies have signed up for the CAPE portal since it launched. That includes names like Ethan Allen and Mattel, which disclosed their participation in quarterly SEC filings.
Some companies, like Costco and FedEx, took an even more aggressive route: they filed lawsuits in the U.S. Court of International Trade to lock in their refund rights before procedural deadlines expired.
Let me pause here and acknowledge what's actually happening: some of the most iconic American brands, companies that Trump has publicly praised and that depend on favorable regulatory treatment, are effectively saying, "With respect, sir, we'd like our money back."
The sheer scale of participation has effectively neutralized the threat. When Costco sues, that's newsworthy. When Costco and Walmart and Apple and GM and FedEx all apply, it's not a provocation, it's a market movement. There's safety in numbers, and 26,000 is a lot of numbers.
As one trade lawyer put it to Politico, the quiet approach, using the non-public portal and burying refund totals in SEC filing fine print, is "far less likely to attract Trump's ire than headline-grabbing lawsuits." It's the corporate equivalent of slipping out the back door while the boss is looking the other way.
Between a Rock and a Fiduciary Duty
Here's where the story gets genuinely uncomfortable for corporate leadership.
Public company directors and officers have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of shareholders. That's not a suggestion. That's law. And failing to pursue billions of dollars in legally entitled refunds? That's the kind of decision that gets shareholder derivative lawsuits filed.
Nat Halvorson, a partner at Baker McKenzie and former official at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, captured the dilemma perfectly: "What is it worth to you to go after the money, when it comes with an incalculable risk?"
That risk isn't abstract. Over the course of two terms, Trump has shown repeatedly that he will use his platform, social media, regulatory agencies, contracting decisions, to reward friends and punish perceived enemies. Companies have watched as targets of presidential ire faced investigations, lost government contracts, or found their mergers suddenly facing unexpected regulatory headwinds.
But here's the flip side of that coin: not pursuing refunds carries its own, arguably more concrete risk. If a CEO decides to leave $10 billion in government-held funds to avoid political friction, and shareholders later sue claiming breach of fiduciary duty... well, "the president might have tweeted about us" is not a particularly strong defense in court.
The result is a fascinating corporate tightrope walk: pursue the money (because you legally almost have to), but do it as quietly as possible (because you politically want to).
The 'Blacklist' Whisper
On K Street, the lobbying corridor that connects corporate America to Washington, a darker rumor has been circulating.
The White House, according to multiple sources, is reportedly keeping a blacklist of companies that have pursued refunds by suing the administration. Asked directly about those fears, Trump's response to CNBC was characteristically elliptical: "They've got to know me very well."
Whether a literal list exists or not, the psychological effect is the same. Companies are structuring their refund strategies around managing perception as much as maximizing recovery:
- Using the CAPE portal rather than filing public lawsuits (the portal is not publicly searchable)
- Disclosing refund pursuits in SEC filings rather than press releases
- Avoiding public commentary that could be interpreted as criticism of the tariffs themselves
It's a fascinating display of corporate risk management in action, essentially, companies are treating this the way they'd handle any other geopolitical risk factor, right alongside supply chain disruptions and currency fluctuations.
But the question everyone is asking: what can Trump actually do about it?
The honest answer: we don't entirely know. The administration could slow-walk the refund process, impose new regulatory burdens, or find other levers of pressure. CBP has already said refunds will take 60 to 90 days to process after acceptance, and that's assuming no appeals or delays.
The administration also has a June 7, 2026 deadline to appeal the refund order, which could freeze everything.
So the story isn't over. The checks aren't in the mail yet.
What Happens Next
The first wave of refund payments was expected to begin processing around May 11, 2026. More than $35 billion had already been processed and was on its way to corporate bank accounts as of earlier this month.
But the path from "approved" to "deposited" is far from guaranteed:
- The administration could appeal the refund order, potentially freezing payments
- CBP's validation process involves multiple stages of review, any of which could introduce delays
- Companies that opted for the portal rather than lawsuits may have fewer legal remedies if disputes arise
And then there's the longer game. Trump has already imposed a temporary 10% tariff set to expire in July, and is working on alternative tariff authorities to replace the IEEPA-based duties that were struck down. As he put it himself: "We're doing it a different way. We're going to end up with the same."
In other words, the companies getting refunds today may find themselves paying new tariffs tomorrow, and the "remember them" remark suggests the administration is tracking who applied for what.
What This Means for Your Business
If you're a business owner or trade compliance officer reading this, you're probably wondering: what should we do?
Here's the practical framework:
The legal case is clear. The tariffs were ruled illegal. The refunds are court-ordered. You have a legal right to pursue them, and in many cases, a fiduciary obligation to do so.
The political risk is real but diminishing. When it was just Costco and a few others, the spotlight was bright. With 26,000+ companies in the queue, the individual risk has been diluted. There is genuine safety in numbers here.
How you pursue the refund matters. The CAPE portal is the quieter path. Lawsuits are more public but provide stronger legal protections. Consult trade counsel to understand which approach fits your risk profile.
Plan for new tariffs. This refund is likely a temporary reprieve. Build the expectation of new duties into your 2026-2027 forecasting.
The bottom line: the era of "do nothing and hope nobody notices" is over. The money is on the table, your competitors are claiming it, and your shareholders are watching.
The Calculus Has Changed
Trump's threat was real. The fear it generated was real. And for a few weeks, it worked, some of America's largest companies hesitated, waited, watched.
But in the end, $166 billion speaks louder than even the loudest megaphone.
What this moment reveals is something genuinely important about the relationship between political power and corporate decision-making in today's America. Presidents can cajole, threaten, and pressure. But when the sums are large enough, and when the law is clear enough, the business logic eventually prevails. Especially when everyone else is doing it too.
The checks are being written. The companies are quietly cashing them. And whether Trump "remembers" or not... that's a problem for another quarter's earnings call.
Want to stay ahead of trade policy shifts that affect your bottom line? Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly analysis on tariffs, supply chains, and the intersection of politics and business. No jargon, no fluff, just actionable insights from trade professionals who speak your language.